Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] Git remote helpers to implement smart transports.
- From
Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 2, 2009, 18:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <fabb9a1e0912021055m56328d87y11a090a9a9bcb046@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v3a3tfbsx.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Heya,
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 19:52, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Sure, but please search for "second class citizen" in my message.
I read that, but I don't understand how exactly the mapping will make it a non-second class citizen. How will your mapping include the alternative implementation? The word mapping suggests a 1:1 relation between protocol and implementation, so I don't see how the alternative implementation would become first-class :(.
-- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier