From: Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:55:04 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] Git remote helpers to implement smart transports.
Message-ID: <fabb9a1e0912021055m56328d87y11a090a9a9bcb046@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7v3a3tfbsx.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Heya,

On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 19:52, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Sure, but please search for "second class citizen" in my message.

I read that, but I don't understand how exactly the mapping will make
it a non-second class citizen. How will your mapping include the
alternative implementation? The word mapping suggests a 1:1 relation
between protocol and implementation, so I don't see how the
alternative implementation would become first-class :(.

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier