Re: git-rm isn't the inverse action of git-add

> I don't per se require undo actions. I just don't understand why git-rm
> refuses to remove the file from the index, even if I didn't commit it.
> The index is just an intermediate record of the changes in my
> understandings, and the rm action would also be intermediate until it's
> being committed. And a non-committed action being deleted shouldn't need
> a special confirmation from me, especially not one which is consisting
> of a combination of two flags (of which one is a destructive one).