From: Jakub Narebski Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:20:24 GMT Subject: Re: git-rm isn't the inverse action of git-add Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <46895EA4.5040803@jaeger.mine.nu> Christian Jaeger wrote: > I don't per se require undo actions. I just don't understand why git-rm > refuses to remove the file from the index, even if I didn't commit it. > The index is just an intermediate record of the changes in my > understandings, and the rm action would also be intermediate until it's > being committed. And a non-committed action being deleted shouldn't need > a special confirmation from me, especially not one which is consisting > of a combination of two flags (of which one is a destructive one). Should git-rm refuse to remove index entry if it is different from working directory version or not? -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git