Re: What's in git.git (stable)
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 22, 2006, 20:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <emhdir$he9$1@sea.gmane.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vwt4jzrjb.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
<opublikowany i wysłany>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Possibilities: > > (1) Forget about that "protection" business. If you do not > want mistakes, use 'branch.*.merge' but otherwise we will > continue to follow the good old "first set of branches" > rule.
What about marking default branch to merge explicitely using "Merge:" in remotes/<repo>, or remote.<name>.merge?
-- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git