Re: What's in git.git (stable)
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Dec 22, 2006, 20:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vejqrznwo.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <emhdir$he9$1@sea.gmane.org>
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:
Show 13 quoted lines
> <opublikowany i wysłany> > > Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Possibilities: >> >> (1) Forget about that "protection" business. If you do not >> want mistakes, use 'branch.*.merge' but otherwise we will >> continue to follow the good old "first set of branches" >> rule. > > What about marking default branch to merge explicitely using > "Merge:" in remotes/<repo>, or remote.<name>.merge?
Sorry, how is that an improvement over the current branch.*.merge? and how would that help not breaking existing setups?