Re: What's in git.git (stable)

From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Dec 27, 2006, 02:14 UTC
Message-ID: <7vslf2axvj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <368927.59162.qm@web31804.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com> writes:

Show 18 quoted lines

> --- Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
>> Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com> writes:
>> 
>> >> I am not quite sure about that.  An old timer would work in a
>> >> newly cloned repository after all, and what this "newbie
>> >> protection" is breaking is not existing repositories but
>> >> expectation from existing users.
>> >
>> > Hmm, "newbie protection" doesn't sound good.  It sounds like
>> > "screw the old-timers and let's change well-established workflow".
>> 
>> As far as I am concerned, this is a topic already closed four
>> days ago with commit fb8696d9.
>> 
>> Are you way too behind, are you rubbing it in, or am I
>> hallucinating and fb8696d9 did not actually fix it?
>
> I'm behind.  I'll pull and take a look at that commit.

Thanks.

And sorry that I sounded harsher than necessary. Between the two paragraphs, I meant to say "... with commit fb8696d9. It was a mistake, I broke existing workflows, I apologized, and the commit should have fixed it".