Re: StGit repo & gitweb, was Re: [PATCH] merge-recursive: add/add really is modify/modify with an empty base
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 13, 2006, 11:56 UTC
- Message-ID
- <elopl4$3nk$1@sea.gmane.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0612131232270.3635@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Yet another question: On repo.or.cz, I searched for the "commit" "8d41555" > (upper right side, very nice, although the search button is lacking, which > is needed for some browsers like w3m).
The problem is where to put it. The previous version didn't even had the "select type" but used [undocumented] search operators 'author:', 'committer:' and 'pickaxe:'.
> But I got _two_ results, the one I > expected, and its child (probably because it contains the sha1 as part of > the parent tag). Is this intended behaviour? After all, I search for the > commit...
Actually, "commit" is a bit of misnomer, as it searches commits contents (commit body). You can go to given commit easier by hand editing URL, editing "a=commit;h=8d41555".
-- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git