Re: [PATCH 3/3] add test case for recursive merge
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Dec 10, 2006, 22:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0612102350050.28348@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vmz5w5tuw.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Hi,
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes: > > > this test succeeds consistently on the machine where I tested it > > originally, but fails on another of my machines, but only when run without > > "-v". Very annoying. I will not have time to investigate until Monday, > > though. > > There seem to be cases where stage #1 contains blob 'B' or 'A' > or nothing depending on something totally random. Ring a bell?
Not at all.
It seems that one merge is conflicting on "a1", and not storing _anything_ in the resulting (unclean) tree. So, there is no stage 1.
However, I also saw that something is left in stage 1 on the box where the problem arises. Tomorrow.
Ciao, Dscho