StGit repo & gitweb, was Re: [PATCH] merge-recursive: add/add really is modify/modify with an empty base
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Dec 13, 2006, 11:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0612131232270.3635@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vvekgl2z2.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Hi,
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Although I would feel very happy about this change, Catalin > might want to be informed about potential interaction this > change might have with his commit 8d41555 in StGIT.
Indeed. Catalin, do you have any suggestion how to proceed? Do you want to introduce a check if the file exists prior to re-generating it? Or do you need some version check?
BTW why is StGit not on kernel.org?
Not that it matters: repo.or.cz has a nice mirror. Pasky, how powerful is that machine? I am a happy user of the gitweb interface on that box...
Yet another question: On repo.or.cz, I searched for the "commit" "8d41555" (upper right side, very nice, although the search button is lacking, which is needed for some browsers like w3m). But I got _two_ results, the one I expected, and its child (probably because it contains the sha1 as part of the parent tag). Is this intended behaviour? After all, I search for the commit...
Ciao, Dscho