Re: [PATCH 0/3] Updates to the safe.directory config option

> "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> Here is a very fast response to the security release yesterday.
> 
> Wow.  While I were down the whole day yesterday after sending the
> release announcement, it seems a lot have happened X-<.  Does your
> "a very fast" expect only "wow, thanks for a fast reponse", or does
> it also expect "ok, we'll take a deep look with a spoonful of salt
> as it was prepared in haste"?

>> The second patch here is an adaptation from a contributor who created a pull
>> request against git/git [1]. I augmented the patch with a test (the test
>> infrastructure is added in patch 1).
>>
>> The third patch is a change to the safe.directory config option to include a
>> possible "*" value to completely opt-out of the check. This will be
>> particularly helpful for cases where users run Git commands within a
>> container. This container workflow always runs as a different user than the
>> host, but also the container does not have access to the host's system or
>> global config files. It's also helpful for users who don't want to set the
>> config for a large number of shared repositories [2].
> 
> Let me take a look how well these integrate into the maintenance
> tracks.
> 
> I would appreciate something that is targetted and narrow that can
> be applied to the oldest maintenance track (2.30.3) and then merged
> upwards, plus niceties on top that does not necessarily have to
> apply to the oldest ones if the surrounding code or tests were
> changed more recently.