Re: [PATCH 4/4] doc add: renormalize is not idempotent for CRCRLF
- From
Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>
- Date
- Aug 8, 2022, 14:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <e454bf85-046d-6205-57e7-4c00b9faa589@iee.email>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq5yj6z5rx.fsf@gitster.g>
I've unfortunately had some family issue which prevented me doing any work.
If I haven't managed anything by the end of the week. I'd be happy if others took it forward.
On 05/08/2022 23:26, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email> writes: > >>> How about this: >>> >>> This option implies `-u`. Lone CR characters are untouched. CRCRLF cleans to CRLF. >> That is probably sufficient. It drops the awkward 'idempotent'. And >> indicates this edge case, though doesn't highlight that the resultant >> CRLF still leaves the file only partially renormalised. >> >> I'll reword. > It's been a few weeks since the last activity on this topic. > Anything you guys need unblocked to move forward? > > Thanks. >