Re: [PATCH 4/4] doc add: renormalize is not idempotent for CRCRLF
- From
Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
- Date
- Aug 6, 2022, 19:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20220806192225.gu7o2avekbtcg6py@tb-raspi4>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq5yj6z5rx.fsf@gitster.g>
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 03:26:10PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email> writes: > > >> How about this: > >> > >> This option implies `-u`. Lone CR characters are untouched. CRCRLF cleans to CRLF. > > That is probably sufficient. It drops the awkward 'idempotent'. And > > indicates this edge case, though doesn't highlight that the resultant > > CRLF still leaves the file only partially renormalised. > > > > I'll reword. > > It's been a few weeks since the last activity on this topic. > Anything you guys need unblocked to move forward? > > Thanks. >
Not from my point of view. My understanding is, that the short version is OK for everybody:
This option implies `-u`. Lone CR characters are untouched. CRCRLF cleans to CRLF.
Is it OK to ask you for a local ammend to push this further ?