Re: My first git success [not quite]
- From
- walt <wa1ter@myrealbox.com>
- Date
- Jan 14, 2006, 20:41 UTC
- Message-ID
- <dqbnl1$3si$1@sea.gmane.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0601141117120.13339@g5.osdl.org>
Linus Torvalds wrote: [...]
> Now, what happens is that when you change branches with a dirty tree, the > "git checkout" will do one of two things: > > - if the dirty files are _identical_ in both branches...
I'm sorry to be quibbling over semantics, truly I am! But here is my confusion: if modified-but-uncommitted (hence dirty) files are not associated with *any* branch, then how could 'dirty' files be 'in' both branches (or 'in' any branch at all)?
Thanks for your continued patience with me! I hate to distract you from your real work -- I can only hope that others are learning as much from your answers as I am.