Re: My first git success
- From
Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@stonehenge.com>
- Date
- Jan 13, 2006, 18:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <86y81kvtvj.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0601130909290.3535@g5.osdl.org>
>>>>> "Linus" == Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:
Linus> I still hope the exchanges will result in more docs, or at least other Linus> lurkers on the list also learning a new trick or two..
I've also enjoyed a bit of success putting a website under git. I started working on AJAX-ing some of the code, but I needed to do maintainence on the live site, so I've just simply done "git-checkout master" to work on that, and "git-checkout ajax; git-pull . master" when I want to continue work on the ajax upgrades.
However, before I bug-fix, I have to "snapshot" any working changes in the ajax branch or I would lose them on "git-checkout master", which gives me commits that look like "snapshot". Am I doing that wrong? Is there a better way to do parallel development of a "live vs upgrade" branch, and make commits only when I make progress?
-- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!