Re: My first git success [not quite]
- From
- walt <wa1ter@myrealbox.com>
- Date
- Jan 14, 2006, 15:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <dqb5vg$a09$1@sea.gmane.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0601130909290.3535@g5.osdl.org>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, walt wrote: >> And it was all so easy I never broke a sweat. Amazing!
> ...Most people don't bother to > explain their problems well...
I see I still have a problem: my mental model of how git works is still wrong.
I used 'git-checkout -b test' to create a disposable place to test the patch I was given.
Okay, making sure I'm now sitting in 'test', I apply the patch to foo.c and do my testing.
Now, intending to delete my 'test' branch, I do git-checkout master. My mental model predicts that 'master' should still be identical to 'origin' because I did the patching in 'test'. Am I right so far?
The problem I see is that, after switching back to 'master', foo.c is the patched version, not your original version. I figured that the git-checkout would overwrite any changes I made to foo.c, but that doesn't seem to be the case. To get your original version back I had to delete foo.c and do a git-checkout foo.c (or git-checkout -f master).
So, I clearly don't understand what git-checkout does. It doesn't seem to touch the already-checked-out sources at all, which is what I would expect it to do.
Can someone hit me with the clue-stick here? Thanks!