Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] rebase: factor out branch_base calculation
- From
- Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 17, 2022, 09:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <c0213afe-658d-8562-3d2a-9e254c742730@dunelm.org.uk>
- In-Reply-To
- <221013.867d13ldzm.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com>
On 13/10/2022 20:21, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
>> +static void fill_branch_base(struct rebase_options *options,
>> + struct object_id *branch_base)
>> +{
>> + struct commit_list *merge_bases = NULL;
>> +
>> + merge_bases = get_merge_bases(options->onto, options->orig_head);
>> + if (!merge_bases || merge_bases->next)
>> + oidcpy(branch_base, null_oid());
>> + else
>> + oidcpy(branch_base, &merge_bases->item->object.oid);
>> +
>> + free_commit_list(merge_bases);
>> +}
>
> I wondered if this could be a bit shorter/less wrap-yWhere's the wrapping?
> with shorter > variable names, anyway, I see it's code copied from above, so nevermind > in advance... :)
As it is copied it is easier to review leaving it as is I think.
Show 24 quoted lines
> static void fill_branch_base(struct rebase_options *o, struct object_id *dst)
> {
> struct commit_list *mb = get_merge_bases(o->onto, o->orig_head);
> const struct object_id *src = (!mb || mb->next) ? null_oid() :
> &mb->item->object.oid;
>
> oidcpy(dst, src);
> free_commit_list(mb);
> }
>
>
>> @@ -1669,8 +1678,8 @@ int cmd_rebase(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>> if (!options.onto)
>> die(_("Does not point to a valid commit '%s'"),
>> options.onto_name);
>> + fill_branch_base(&options, &branch_base);
>> }
>> -
>> if (options.fork_point > 0)
>> options.restrict_revision =
>> get_fork_point(options.upstream_name, options.orig_head);
>
> I wouldn't mind the stray whitespace change, but here it seems
> unintentional, in 7/8 your change on top is:Thanks, well spotted, I'm sure I've fixed this at least once already, I must have reintroduced it when fixing a rebase conflict. I'll fix it again.
Best Wishes
Phillip
Show 13 quoted lines
> @@ -1680,6 +1691,9 @@ int cmd_rebase(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) > options.onto_name); > fill_branch_base(&options, &branch_base); > } > + if (keep_base && options.reapply_cherry_picks) > + options.upstream = options.onto; > + > if (options.fork_point > 0) > options.restrict_revision = > get_fork_point(options.upstream_name, options.orig_head); > > Presumably we want to have \n\n spacing for both of those, and to not > remove the spacing here in 6/8, only to add it back?