Re: [Q] merge squash unexpected conflicts
- From
- Cory Sharp <cory.sharp@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 14, 2009, 18:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <bb9d69200905141125i4a8ffaa8j6aea2a6c44de0c7d@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20090514070129.GL8212@noris.de>
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Michael Radziej <mir@noris.de> wrote:
> git merge --squash is not a merge at all. ... > It is useful only in very special circumstances.
You're right. I (incorrectly) thought I had to use --squash to properly interface with an svn branch and trunk through git-svn. I thought not using squash would trigger hundreds of commits - it doesn't, nice things happen with just "merge".
Thanks everyone for helping me, Cory