Re: [Q] merge squash unexpected conflicts
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 14, 2009, 06:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v4ovoxk0n.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <bb9d69200905132334m7a4e3a4akde3529abeab5a09@mail.gmail.com>
Cory Sharp <cory.sharp@gmail.com> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
>> If you want support for repeated merges by merge tracking, you do not want >> todiscard the merge history by using --squash. > > Why doesn't --squash do merge tracking? The help didn't indicate that > it doesn't, and I don't understand why ...
Because "merge" is (no surprise) what tracks what (two or more) things were merged. And with --squash you are choosing not to make a merge. I am not sure if there is any more thing to be explained...