Re: [Q] merge squash unexpected conflicts
- From
- Cory Sharp <cory.sharp@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 14, 2009, 06:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <bb9d69200905132354h6b64171g24351840fb1d0893@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v4ovoxk0n.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Because "merge" is (no surprise) what tracks what (two or more) things > were merged. And with --squash you are choosing not to make a merge. I > am not sure if there is any more thing to be explained...
Yeah I'm not quite getting it. Thanks for trying to explain, though.