Re: [PATCH RFC3.5 05/12] send-email: Improve redability and error-handling in send_message's sendmail code
- From
Michael Witten <mfwitten@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 19, 2009, 02:43 UTC
- Message-ID
- <b4087cc50904181943t71d501a6r51bb4cc846f32f78@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <18071eea0904181917u7c7187bubc8fab6ede2d19ef@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 21:17, Thomas Adam <thomas.adam22@gmail.com> wrote:
> More concerning is that it's a perl 5.10ism -- you cannot assume that > perl 5.10 is installed on all platforms. I really wouldn't use this > construct.
See that's the thing: How am I supposed to know it's a perl 5.10ism? The Perl docs give absolutely no clue; Perl[5] is based way too much on practice rather than theory, because only people that have been using it since day 1 know what's going on. A couple of weeks ago, I went to the perldoc website and just read each website one after the other---that is my total knowledge of Perl, and already I've caught flack a number of times for having used 'new-fangled technologies'; I really wish the docs would specify when a feature became available.
... add that to the list of perldoc shortcomings.