Re: git pull for update of netdev fails.
- From
- Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 23, 2006, 13:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <b0943d9e0609230615t60e6d573r4abe043c079a2367@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20060923040942.GG8259@pasky.or.cz>
On 23/09/06, Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Dear diary, on Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 06:00:35AM CEST, I got a letter > where Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> said that... > > I can see the same concept of ref history being useful even for > > core git-rebase and doing it this way would also give it to StGIT > > without Catalin needing to change code. > > In my StGIT tree, I don't want to have arbitrary N-days cutoff point, > I want all the patches history preserved at least as long as I carry > the patch, because it's just as valuable as the "regular" project > history to me.
That's how it currently works (the top of the log is in refs/patches/<branch>/<patch>.log). I gave up the idea of using reflogs for patch history.
-- Catalin