Re: git pull for update of netdev fails.
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Sep 20, 2006, 16:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0609201801110.19042@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <20060920155431.GO8259@pasky.or.cz>
Hi,
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Petr Baudis wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> Dear diary, on Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 05:28:08PM CEST, I got a letter > where Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> said that... > > However, you can tell git that Jeff is being difficult by marking such > > branches individually as being rebased. > > This is really a wrong way of describing the problem - I'd say that Git > is being difficult here. The point is, the subsystem maintainers need to > maintain stacks of patches and rebase against the main kernel branch > regularily, and they want to still publish their current state. So it's > not really any of them being strange or difficult, but Git being so > because it has no seamless support for tracking those branches.
So, what exactly do you propose? I do not see any way to help this problem, since you really throw away history. So, the git-is-being-difficult has to be taken with a pound of salt here.
Ciao, Dscho