From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:15:01 GMT
Subject: Re: git pull for update of netdev fails.
Message-ID: <b0943d9e0609230615t60e6d573r4abe043c079a2367@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060923040942.GG8259@pasky.or.cz>

On 23/09/06, Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> wrote:
> Dear diary, on Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 06:00:35AM CEST, I got a letter
> where Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> said that...
> > I can see the same concept of ref history being useful even for
> > core git-rebase and doing it this way would also give it to StGIT
> > without Catalin needing to change code.
>
> In my StGIT tree, I don't want to have arbitrary N-days cutoff point,
> I want all the patches history preserved at least as long as I carry
> the patch, because it's just as valuable as the "regular" project
> history to me.

That's how it currently works (the top of the log is in
refs/patches/<branch>/<patch>.log). I gave up the idea of using
reflogs for patch history.

-- 
Catalin