Re: [PATCH 1/9] Allow callers of unpack_trees() to handle failure
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Feb 5, 2008, 01:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LSU.1.00.0802050107440.8543@racer.site>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LNX.1.00.0802041334450.13593@iabervon.org>
Hi,
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> Return an error from unpack_trees() instead of calling die(), and exit > with an error in read-tree and builtin-commit.
Technically, there is still a possibility that an xcalloc() fails with a die(), but I agree that it is a good change.
BTW after the whole series (was too lazy to check the individual patches), I count one instance in builtin-checkout.c and two in diff-lib.c where unpack_trees()' return value is not checked. Is this intended?
Ciao, Dscho