Re: [PATCH] bash completion: Hide more plumbing commands

From: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Date: Aug 26, 2008, 19:23 UTC
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.1.00.0808261517200.19665@iabervon.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080826190752.GM26523@spearce.org>

On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:

Show 13 quoted lines

> Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > > 
> > > Unless/until we have an easy way to obtain the information "git-ls-files
> > > -u" gives during conflict resolution, ls-files should stay on the list of
> > > commonly used commands.
> > 
> > Doesn't "git status" tell you that? Or do you want the extra info from the 
> > implicit --stage?
> 
> I think he doesn't want to see the other files that are already
> merged successfully.  git status shows them, git ls-files -u
> does not.

I think it might make sense to support "git status --unmerged" or something like that, where it filters the output by the tags it would show.

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*