Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/2] post-receive-email: declaring and consistently using one output encoding
- From
Jon Jensen <jon@endpoint.com>
- Date
- Mar 14, 2012, 17:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LFD.2.02.1203141153460.4355@fnzzl>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v62eeewl8.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Thu, 8 Mar 2012, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
>> Patches are targetted at 1.7.11 unless there is overwhelming interest >> in them landing sooner. > > Even if there is none, I wouldn't mind taking it for 1.7.10, if only to > reduce the chance that the patch gets forgotten again, provided that > there is a clear concensus that this is a good change that won't regress > people who have been actually using this sample in real life.
+1 from me. This would solve an occasional problem we have because encodings aren't set in post-receive-email output.
Jon