Re: libgit2 - a true git library
- From
Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
- Date
- Nov 1, 2008, 01:49 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LFD.2.00.0810312146420.13034@xanadu.home>
- In-Reply-To
- <20081101013815.GF29036@artemis.corp>
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 01:33:51AM +0000, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > OTOH they would certainly come out clean if the license was BSD since > > the spirit of that license explicitly allows closing up the whole > > library and adding extra features. > > I think it's pretty clear most contributor from git.git would be driven > away if the license isn't GPLish. So I was basing my answer on a > supposition it would be.
Sure. My point is the difference in guiltiness. Even if a LGPL license doesn't prevent all abuses, it at least allows for public denunciations at the very least.
Nicolas