Re: [PATCH] pack-objects: Allow missing base objects when creating thin packs

From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Date: Aug 12, 2008, 18:12 UTC
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0808121402440.22892@xanadu.home>
In-Reply-To: <20080812164149.GB31092@spearce.org>

On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:

>  Now with a test! :-)
>

[...]

Show 14 quoted lines

> +# Clone patch_clone indirectly by cloning base and fetching.
> +#
> +test_expect_success \
> +    'indirectly clone patch_clone' \
> +    '(mkdir user_clone &&
> +      cd user_clone &&
> +      git init &&
> +      git pull ../.git &&
> +      test $(git rev-parse HEAD) = $B
> +
> +      git pull ../patch_clone/.git &&
> +      test $(git rev-parse HEAD) = $C
> +     )
> +    '

What if the first test command fails?  Won't its result be ignored?

Nicolas