Re: RFC: Allow missing objects during packing
- From
Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
- Date
- Aug 12, 2008, 04:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LFD.1.10.0808120023250.22892@xanadu.home>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080812012859.GT26363@spearce.org>
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> > Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: > > > If the check is only about a thin delta base that is not going to be > > > transmit, I'd agree. But I do not see how you are distinguishing that > > > case and the case where an object you are actually sending is missing (in > > > which case we would want to error out, wouldn't we?) > > Turns out to be pretty simple I think. We just delay the > error handling for ->type < 0 until write_object(). If we > get this far we know we wanted to include the object but > we really don't have it. Up until that point its fine > for us to get objects which are missing, we'll just wind > up with a suboptimal pack.
If you're going to die anyway due to an object with unknown type, better do so _before_ going through the delta search phase and leaving a partial pack behind. IOW, the type check can be performed in prepare_pack() instead of write_object() like:
diff --git a/builtin-pack-objects.c b/builtin-pack-objects.c index 2dadec1..01ab49c 100644 --- a/builtin-pack-objects.c +++ b/builtin-pack-objects.c @@ -1722,8 +1733,12 @@ static void prepare_pack(int window, int depth) if (entry->no_try_delta) continue; - if (!entry->preferred_base) + if (!entry->preferred_base) { nr_deltas++; + if (entry->type < 0) + die("unable to get type of object %s", + sha1_to_hex(entry->idx.sha1)); + } delta_list[n++] = entry; } Also a comment in check_object() mentioning where the return value of sha1_object_info() is verified would be in order. And I also agree with Junio about a test script for this so the usage is fully demonstrated, and to ensure it keeps on working as intended (most people will simply never exercise this otherwise). Nicolas