Re: auto gc again
- From
Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
- Date
- Mar 20, 2008, 04:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LFD.1.00.0803200030020.2947@xanadu.home>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vfxumyr2r.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> writes: > > > So you have 17.1 seconds for a single pack vs 18.4 seconds for 66 packs. > > > > Compare that to 24.9s without that patch. > > Very interesting --- why should it affect a single pack case at all?
It is not:
Single pack = 17.1s 66 packs with commit f7c22cc6 = 18.4s 66 packs without commit f7c22cc6 = 24.9s
The point is that having many packs doesn't impose a significant overhead anymore when comparing to the single pack case.
> Thanks, let's raise it to 50 then.
Having only to set gc.auto=0 to disable it entirely is also a good thing.
> But I am still puzzled...
Please tell me why if this is still the case.
Nicolas