Re: [PATCH 00/15] git-note: A mechanisim for providing free-form after-the-fact annotations on commits
On Mon, 28 May 2007, Johan Herland wrote:
>
> I still don't see what makes note objects inherently more expensive than
> commit objects. Except for the refs, of course, but we're getting rid
> of those (at least replacing them with a more efficient reverse mapping).
It's exactly the refs that I worry about.
Anything that needs to read in all notes at startup is going to be _slow_.
In contrast, commits we read when (and only when) we need them.
Linus