Re: [PATCH 2/3] stripspace: respect repository config
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Nov 22, 2016, 16:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.2.20.1611221712480.3746@virtualbox>
- In-Reply-To
- <CACsJy8D5oBR+vo2B+Ro2Q4SX0CG3jME4Gfs1_6AohccmpNvD0A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Duy,
On Tue, 22 Nov 2016, Duy Nguyen wrote:
Show 37 quoted lines
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Johannes Schindelin
> <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> > When eff80a9 (Allow custom "comment char", 2013-01-16) taught the
> > `stripspace` command to respect the config setting `core.commentChar`,
> > it forgot that this variable may be defined in .git/config.
> >
> > So when rebasing interactively with a commentChar defined in the current
> > repository's config, the help text at the bottom of the edit script
> > potentially used an incorrect comment character. This was not only
> > funny-looking, but also resulted in tons of warnings like this one:
> >
> > Warning: the command isn't recognized in the following line
> > - #
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
> > ---
> > builtin/stripspace.c | 4 +++-
> > t/t0030-stripspace.sh | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/builtin/stripspace.c b/builtin/stripspace.c
> > index 15e716e..1e62a00 100644
> > --- a/builtin/stripspace.c
> > +++ b/builtin/stripspace.c
> > @@ -44,8 +44,10 @@ int cmd_stripspace(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> > if (argc)
> > usage_with_options(stripspace_usage, options);
> >
> > - if (mode == STRIP_COMMENTS || mode == COMMENT_LINES)
> > + if (mode == STRIP_COMMENTS || mode == COMMENT_LINES) {
> > + setup_git_directory_gently(NULL);
> > git_config(git_default_config, NULL);
> > + }
>
> This conditional config file reading is a trap for similar bugs to
> happen again. Is there any reason we should not just mark the command
> RUN_SETUP_GENTLY in git.c and call git_config() here unconditionally?As I plan to slip these patches into Git for Windows v2.11.0, i.e. making this a last-minute hot fix, I want to err on the side of caution. So I'd rather keep this conditional (it might regress on the performance front, or something).
Ciao, Dscho