Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] git diff <(command1) <(command2)
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Nov 12, 2016, 10:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.2.20.1611121106110.3746@virtualbox>
- In-Reply-To
- <CA+P7+xrFYj7sepdz1xrEEaqmXQWfRkBz3CsWjYK6OZsZRMLbUA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Fri, 11 Nov 2016, Jacob Keller wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: > > Dennis Kaarsemaker <dennis@kaarsemaker.net> writes: > > > >> No tests or documentation updates yet, and I'm not sure whether > >> --follow-symlinks in other modes than --no-index should be supported, ignored > >> (as it is now) or cause an error, but I'm leaning towards the third option. > > > > My knee-jerk reaction is: > > > > * The --no-index mode should default to your --follow-symlinks > > behaviour, without any option to turn it on or off. > > > > I agree. We shouldn't have to specify this for no-index.
Ummm. *My* idea of --no-index was for it to behave as similar to the --index version as possible. For example when comparing directories containing symlinks. You seem intent on breaking this scenario.
Ciao, Johannes