Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] status: V2 porcelain status

From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Aug 3, 2016, 16:10 UTC
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1608031808130.107993@virtualbox>
In-Reply-To: <CAPc5daVuD7K7zKEG4yHTjBU77rUbdVcbSeBgX9eAJVMWMmxC2w@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Junio,

On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 11 quoted lines

> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Johannes Schindelin
> <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> > Any word when it will be included in `pu`, at least?
> 
> I've been waiting to see that the amount and quality of
> comments from others indicate that the series passed
> the phase that goes through frequent rerolls. Having a
> serious review in the thread that demonstrates and
> concludes that it is well designed, well implemented,
> and ready to go would help, of course.

Oh, I thought I had stated clearly already that what with Jeff being my colleague and working on a feature I have a lot of interest in, I had reviewed this patch series even before it was submitted to the Git mailing list.

I would have been fine with the first iteration. And I had nothing to add to the subsequent iterations, they are just as fine for me. I think the patch series is ready to go.

The prospect of accelerating the Git prompt is also enticing.

Ciao, Dscho