Re: [RFC] Use a 16-tree instead of a 256-tree for storing notes
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Aug 27, 2009, 11:56 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0908271356020.7562@intel-tinevez-2-302>
- In-Reply-To
- <4A95383A.4080104@op5.se>
Hi,
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> If it's to be squashed in, why mention the 256-tree at all
It was labeled RFC, so I think it is perfectly fine to compare with other contenders.
Thanks, Dscho