From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:56:37 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC] Use a 16-tree instead of a 256-tree for storing notes
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0908271356020.7562@intel-tinevez-2-302>
In-Reply-To: <4A95383A.4080104@op5.se>

Hi,

On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, Andreas Ericsson wrote:


> If it's to be squashed in, why mention the 256-tree at all

It was labeled RFC, so I think it is perfectly fine to compare with other 
contenders.

Thanks,
Dscho