Re: [RFC PATCH] stash: accept options also when subcommand 'save' is omitted
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Aug 18, 2009, 22:37 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0908190035140.8306@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <vpqtz0423jk.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
Hi,
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Matthieu Moy wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes: > > > But it is sloppy, in that it blindly accepts options that might be > > valid for several subcommands, not just "save". > > I wouldn't call that sloppy. 'save' is the default command, if you don't > provide any command, then 'save' will be used.
'save' might be the default command, but we don't trigger it with _any_ crap, for a very good reason. Read the commit log for git-stash.sh to know why.
Show 5 quoted lines
> > So please register my objection. > > I will if you register my objection to yours ;-). > > Jokes aside,
If you think that's funny, I don't. I actually put a lot of thought into the issue whether to allow _any_ parameter with looks like an option to trigger "save". And I very much had to come to the decision that no, that is too dangerous.
So I cannot take your objection seriously.
Ciao, Dscho