Re: [PATCH] Use DIFF_XDL_SET/DIFF_OPT_SET instead of raw bit-masking
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Feb 17, 2009, 22:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0902172354570.10279@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.GSO.2.00.0902170918180.27811@kiwi.cs.ucla.edu>
Hi,
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Keith Cascio wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > But these improvements stand well on their own.
That was my point; without anything on top I would not like to risk regressions that easily.
Show 5 quoted lines
> > ... this does not look good to me, without a compelling reason why we > > want to have the patch nevertheless. > > Is there something you dislike about the code style? As always I'm > happy to adjust it.
If you had not so conveniently clipped what I quoted just before the three dots, I could point out that it adds roughly double the number of lines as it removes.
Ciao, Dscho