Re: receive.denyCurrentBranch
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Feb 8, 2009, 10:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0902081128420.10279@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <20090208042910.19079.qmail@science.horizon.com>
Hi,
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, George Spelvin wrote:
> (Prompted by the 1.6.2-rc0 announcement.) > > Myself, I always thought the obvious way to handle this problem was to > detach the HEAD. Is there a reson there's no "detach" option for this?
It's insane, that's what it is.
You have _no_ business meddling with a remote working directory, _except_ by logging into that machine and working on that working directory _directly_.
If you do not agree, you have not thought about the implications, i.e. what problems you buy.
Ciao, Dscho