Re: receive.denyCurrentBranch
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 9, 2009, 01:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vtz74wfsm.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0902090038550.10279@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, Jay Soffian wrote: > >> If you had paid attention, you would have noticed that Mercurial did not >> attempt to merge. Rather, it created a new branch head in the remote >> repository. > > So this is the "detached HEAD" idea. Which contradicts the law of the > least surprise.
I do not think so. It is "adopting the symmetric mothership-satellite layout, when it suits the user's workflow".