From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 10:30:12 GMT
Subject: Re: receive.denyCurrentBranch
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0902081128420.10279@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
In-Reply-To: <20090208042910.19079.qmail@science.horizon.com>

Hi,

On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, George Spelvin wrote:

> (Prompted by the 1.6.2-rc0 announcement.)
> 
> Myself, I always thought the obvious way to handle this problem was to
> detach the HEAD.  Is there a reson there's no "detach" option for this?

It's insane, that's what it is.

You have _no_ business meddling with a remote working directory, _except_ 
by logging into that machine and working on that working directory 
_directly_.

If you do not agree, you have not thought about the implications, i.e. 
what problems you buy.

Ciao,
Dscho