Re: [RFC] Git User's Survey 2008
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jul 23, 2008, 16:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0807231659210.8986@racer>
- In-Reply-To
- <200807231654.18019.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com>
Hi,
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Robin Rosenberg wrote:
Show 31 quoted lines
> onsdagen den 23 juli 2008 15.18.40 skrev Johannes Schindelin: > > > On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > > > > > > > Some people prefer to stay anonymous, so I think email is out. > > > > > > > > > 04. Which programming languages you are proficient with? > > > > > (The choices include programming languages used by git) > > > > > (zero or more: multiple choice) > > > > > - C, shell, Perl, Python, Tcl/Tk > > > > > + (should we include other languages, like C++, Java, PHP, > > > > > Ruby,...?) > > > > > > > > Yes, I think this should be a long list. > > > > > > I'd rather not have a "laundry list" of languages. I have put C++ > > > because QGit uses it, Java because of egit/jgit, PHP for web > > > interfaces, Ruby because of GitHub and because of Ruby comminity > > > choosing Git. I should perhaps add Emacs Lisp, HTML+CSS and > > > JavaScript here. What other languages should be considered? > > > > C# at least, since we had one (pretty unsuccessful) attempt at > > reimplementing Git in it. > > What is the reason for the question? Do we want to know what languages > people would like to contribute to Git in or do we want to know what "kind" > of programmers are attracted by Git? Making it a long list should make > it easier to tabulate the responses.
"could contribute" is more appropriate IMHO. Although you might be right to ask "would like to contribute"... ;-)
Ciao, Dscho