Re: [RFC] Git User's Survey 2008
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 23, 2008, 23:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200807240130.31649.jnareb@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <200807231654.18019.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com>
Dnia środa 23. lipca 2008 16:54, Robin Rosenberg napisał:
Show 27 quoted lines
> onsdagen den 23 juli 2008 15.18.40 skrev Johannes Schindelin: >> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Jakub Narebski wrote: >>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote: >>>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Jakub Narebski wrote: >>>> >>>>> 04. Which programming languages you are proficient with? >>>>> (The choices include programming languages used by git) >>>>> (zero or more: multiple choice) >>>>> - C, shell, Perl, Python, Tcl/Tk >>>>> + (should we include other languages, like C++, Java, PHP, >>>>> Ruby,...?) >>>> >>>> Yes, I think this should be a long list. >>> >>> I'd rather not have a "laundry list" of languages. I have put C++ >>> because QGit uses it, Java because of egit/jgit, PHP for web >>> interfaces, Ruby because of GitHub and because of Ruby comminity >>> choosing Git. I should perhaps add Emacs Lisp, HTML+CSS and >>> JavaScript here. What other languages should be considered? >> >> C# at least, since we had one (pretty unsuccessful) attempt at >> reimplementing Git in it. > > What is the reason for the question? Do we want to know what languages > people would like to contribute to Git in or do we want to know what "kind" > of programmers are attracted by Git? Making it a long list should make > it easier to tabulate the responses.
The idea is, I think, to know what languages people could contribute to Git; see analysis of this question at GitSurvey2007 page on git wiki: http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/GitSurvey2007#head-ecb5564d71e4093e2e93e508380407a26dbcbdea
C++ is for QGit, Java for egit/jgit, C# for git#/widgit and perhaps Git-Cheetah, PHP for web interfaces, Ruby because of GitHub, Python because some contrib is in Python, Emacs Lisp for git.el, HTML+CSS and JavaScript for web interfaces; perhaps we should also add AsciiDoc for documentation. And of course "I am not programmer" response...
But I'm not too tied to this question; I guess it can be simply removed if it doesn't offer some important (for us) information.
-- Jakub Narebski Poland