From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:56:56 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] remote show: fix the -n option
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0806091856180.1783@racer>
In-Reply-To: <484D6128.1010800@freesurf.fr>

Hi,

On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Olivier Marin wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin a écrit :
> > 
> > And I do not like this change either.  It proliferates the "we just 
> > die() and do not care about reusing the code where die()ing is not 
> > desired" paradigm.
> 
> I agree and I'm OK to try to do something about that. But not in that patch.
> 
> This patch is just to fix a regression.

But did you not now make it harder to fix "that"?  By relying on the die() 
behaviour in your regression fix?

Whatever,
Dscho