git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [BUG?] "git rebase --interactive" forces me to edit message.

From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date
Jun 5, 2008, 04:38 UTC
Message-ID
<alpine.DEB.1.00.0806050536380.21190@racer>
In-Reply-To
<200806050358.m553wgK9013230@mi0.bluebottle.com>
Hi,
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, しらいしななこ wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> When an interactive rebase stops because of conflicts in a commit marked 
> with pick, the user must edit the file to resolve them, run "git add", 
> and run "git rebase --continue".  It then opens vi and asks the user to 
> edit the message.  If I told the command to edit, I think it is OK to 
> start vi, but when I am just picking the commit, I should be able to use 
> the message from the original commit without having to view nor edit nor 
> save it first. Is this a bug?
No, it is intentional.

If you have to edit, because of conflicts, it may be because _part_ of the commit ended up in upstream already.

To remind the user that the commit message may need to be adjusted, rebase --interactive fires up the editor.

Yes, it happened to me.  Yes, the reminder was helpful.

Hth, Dscho

Previous: Johannes SchindelinNext: しらいしななこ
Message 4 of 8 in “[BUG?] "git rebase --interactive" forces me to edit message.”
  1. しらいしななこJun 5, 2008
  2. Junio C HamanoJun 5, 2008
  3. Johannes SchindelinJun 5, 2008
  4. Johannes SchindelinJun 5, 2008
  5. しらいしななこJun 6, 2008
  6. Junio C HamanoJun 6, 2008
  7. Johannes SchindelinJun 7, 2008
  8. Junio C HamanoJun 7, 2008

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.