Re: Gitk and --no-walk don't play together
- From
- Santi Bejar <santi@agolina.net>
- Date
- Sep 8, 2008, 18:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <adf1fd3d0809081153o5ed8f2d8i94c5b23a2f28858@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LNX.1.10.0809081310260.1621@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de> wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> > On Monday 2008-09-08 12:34, Santi Bejar wrote: >> >>> in an attempt to only show only the tags in the graph, gitk barfs: >> >>Use the "List references" in the file menu. > > Nope, the intention was to have gitk display something like > > * Linux 2.6.26 > | > * Linux 2.6.25 > > without any intermediate commits. >
I think the only option is to generate a graft file specifying 2.6.25 as parent of 2.6.26.
I have an script that generates it. It gives an overview of the branches/tags, where the parents of a branch/tag are the independent branches/tags that are antecesors (search for git-overview in the list). But currently it has a very bad performance, it could be added to git itself like the other history simplifications, but I don´t know.
Santi