Re: coccinelle: adjustments for array.cocci?

From

MEMarkus Elfring <markus.elfring@web.de>

Date

Nov 17, 2019, 18:36 UTC

Message-ID

<ac67f805-fbff-68e9-214e-3f353a1c038f@web.de>

In-Reply-To

<f28f5fb8-2814-9df5-faf2-7146ed1a1f4d@web.de>

>> It was chosen to transform source code fragments (pointer expressions)
>> by two SmPL rules so that the search pattern “sizeof(T)” would work
>> in the third rule.
>
> Ah, right, it would be nice to get rid of those normalization rules,
> especially the second one.

Thanks for such positive feedback.

> I don't see how,

Where is your view too limited at the moment?

> though, without either causing a combinatorial explosion

Growing combinations can become more interesting, can't they?

> or loosening up the matching too much.