Re: [PATCH 02/17] midx: split `get_midx_checksum()` by adding `get_midx_hash()`

> If I didn't have the context of this patch series I would be wondering
> what the actual difference between `get_midx_checksum()` and
> `get_midx_hash()` is. The way the functions are named seems to rather
> indicate that we talk about two different kinds of hashes, rather than
> two different ways to encode them.
>
> Would it maybe be preferable to call them `get_midx_checksum()` and
> `get_midx_checksum_hex()`? While at it, we could go even further and
> rename them to `midx_get_checksum()` and `midx_get_checksum_hex()` to
> conform to our modern best practices.