Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] refs: improvements and fixes for peeling tags

> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> > I'm not particularly fond of the patches 11 to 13. It feels more like
> > playing whack-a-mole, and I very much assume that there still are edge
> > cases where we should properly verify the tagged object type. But
> > changing it in `parse_tag_buffer()` itself causes a bunch of tests to
> > fail where we intentionally create such corrupted tags. So I didn't
> > really dare to touch that part, to be honest.
> >
> > If anybody has suggestions for an alternative approach I'd be very open
> > to it.
> 
> Are you still ;-), or are we ready to declare victory for now and
> mark the topic for 'next'?  It seems that another topic depends on
> this and the topic itself is a good shape enough to advance.